We welcome all comments related to market timing. We do not welcome political and insulting comments, however, and comments of a political nature belong elsewhere and could lead to removal and blocking the originator of such political comments.
You cannot post comments. Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content! Login for Members
XXSPOWER127
He said it!!!
Just like Cramer
I DONT THINK WE WILL GET UP THERE!
100% track record ...
YOUKNOWHATODO!
daniel039209
XXSPOWER127 said:
He said it!!!
Just like Cramer
I DONT THINK WE WILL GET UP THERE!
100% track record ...
YOUKNOWHATO
Being negative for 3 years and yesterday Peter shows 3/4 higher projections and actually sounds POSITIVE. I couldnt believe it, and of course he had to pull back on that surprisingly bullish commentary yesterday to say the above " I DONT THINK WE WILL GET THERE'" Heard that before because then " it is a new ballgame" except the game was still viewed in the most bearish scenario possible.
daniel039209
The MACD signal topped in MAY 2025 its been in downtrend ever since. NDX must be 25+% SPX +18% Explain to me and everyone, how you use the MACD to call it a negative divergence today???? It doesnt compute with reality. "Its a condition NOT a signal"
play_arrow
Comments (4)
You cannot post comments.
Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content!
Login for Members
He said it!!!
Just like Cramer
I DONT THINK WE WILL GET UP THERE!
100% track record ...
YOUKNOWHATODO!
Being negative for 3 years and yesterday Peter shows 3/4 higher projections and actually sounds POSITIVE. I couldnt believe it, and of course he had to pull back on that surprisingly bullish commentary yesterday to say the above " I DONT THINK WE WILL GET THERE'" Heard that before because then " it is a new ballgame" except the game was still viewed in the most bearish scenario possible.
The MACD signal topped in MAY 2025 its been in downtrend ever since. NDX must be 25+% SPX +18% Explain to me and everyone, how you use the MACD to call it a negative divergence today???? It doesnt compute with reality. "Its a condition NOT a signal"
Godspeed on getting well
1-4 of 4