We welcome all comments related to market timing. We do not welcome political and insulting comments, however, and comments of a political nature belong elsewhere and could lead to removal and blocking the originator of such political comments.
You cannot post comments. Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content! Login for Members
bobby4649
this analyis is not about fundamentals. its cycle analysis.
bobby4649
m1.c70 said:
bobby4649 said:
this analyis is not about fundamentals. its cycle analysis.
My comment is about cycles. If you are saying the relative value/price of something is not relevant in looking a cycles based on price then I would disagree with you unless you actually have convincing logical counter argument.
i believe those factors are important catalysts in cycles. but im really only interested in the cycle analysis itself. The part that i dont understand is why when Peter knows the sum of sins +mx +b math that the price tops after cycles top and has multiple confirmed upside targets in every single stock, etf and index he tracks but ignores them. He uses log (fibonacci) to justify some arguments but ignores log (nvda) on others. Its inconsistent and undermines the credibility of the cycle analysis. Why take on math? Hurst argued 18 year was the longest cycle. The peak was Oct 07, why not wait until Oct to call the top? At least that would be grounded in the work.Get people ready but dont get people short.
rickjendz64
Hi Peter. Did you ever adjust our subscriptions for the two weeks you were on vacation? I don't remember seeing anything different in my payments. I thought you would either delay our payment by 2 weeks or reduce one month by roughly half. Please let us know. Thanks!
daniel039209
I think we bought all of Alaska for $7.8 million dollars. It is amazing how things grow
play_arrow
Comments (4)
You cannot post comments.
Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content!
Login for Members
this analyis is not about fundamentals. its cycle analysis.
i believe those factors are important catalysts in cycles. but im really only interested in the cycle analysis itself. The part that i dont understand is why when Peter knows the sum of sins +mx +b math that the price tops after cycles top and has multiple confirmed upside targets in every single stock, etf and index he tracks but ignores them. He uses log (fibonacci) to justify some arguments but ignores log (nvda) on others. Its inconsistent and undermines the credibility of the cycle analysis. Why take on math? Hurst argued 18 year was the longest cycle. The peak was Oct 07, why not wait until Oct to call the top? At least that would be grounded in the work.Get people ready but dont get people short.
Hi Peter. Did you ever adjust our subscriptions for the two weeks you were on vacation? I don't remember seeing anything different in my payments. I thought you would either delay our payment by 2 weeks or reduce one month by roughly half. Please let us know. Thanks!
I think we bought all of Alaska for $7.8 million dollars. It is amazing how things grow
1-4 of 4