Written update

Why Reached and Invalidated Projections Still Matter

Free

A projection being reached or invalidated doesn't necessarily mean it has lost its value. In fact, some of the most interesting levels can come from projections that are technically no longer active.

This is particularly relevant when short-term market fluctuations cause a projection to be invalidated, even though the underlying cycle structure remains intact. The following examples illustrate why it can be worthwhile to keep an eye on these levels, rather than simply discarding them.

Example 1: Minimum requirement to be reached is the start of a projection. Yet the end is not just an arbitrary level


Example 2: Using end of projections level

The far ends of projection ranges are not targets in the same sense as the starting levels. I consider them relevant only when price approaches them, as potential resistance or reversal points. 


Example 3: Even invalidated projections provide important references

Projection X is a particular good example. The first crossing (a) with the continuum, was the "proper" one, coming from a cycle low (b). It got invalidated (because of normal market fluctuations) at c. 

At d, a new upside generation was generated, but based on the new lowest low (e) since the downside crossing.

That new projection is one of the less useful ones, because it is basically reached before it was confirmed. But the original projection from that cycle, while by now invalidated, provides the proper levels (f). This behaviour comes from applying mathematical models to real-world market data, which is inherently noisy and does not always conform to the clean, idealized structures assumed by the models.

Projection Y is another example where the noise is even clearer.


Example 4: Invalidated 40-week cycle (20-week & daily 96.8/110.6 offsets) projection in @ES


Example 5: Invalidated 5-week cycle projections on @NQ

The statistics for this would look quite miserable, but... 



Writer: Steffen (tradeatomy.com)

Position disclosure: As of the publication time stated, I have the following direct or indirect financial interests in the markets or instruments discussed in this analysis:
Long: -
Short: -


No investment advice or recommendations are provided or implied. All information is for educational purposes only. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions.
Please also read our Disclaimer.

Commentary timeline

Comments (2)

We welcome all comments related to market timing. We do not welcome political and insulting comments, however, and comments of a political nature belong elsewhere and could lead to removal and blocking the originator of such political comments.

You cannot post comments.
Sign up for Market Commentary or Bundle membership, or log in if you are already a member.

bcanary964
bcanary964

That's really useful. A similar thing happened in the ES, if you look at the 48.4/55.3 offset there was a lower projection made in July that was invalidated, but it looks like it's acting as resistance on the current drop. The lower projection on the 96.8/110.6 offset isn't as helpful since it was already met when given.

Last updated

1–2 of 2