We welcome all comments related to market timing. We do not welcome political and insulting comments, however, and comments of a political nature belong elsewhere and could lead to removal and blocking the originator of such political comments.
You cannot post comments. Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content! Login for Members
Optimus
Thanks, Peter. Appreciate the update.
howard88
How is the a/d line looking? With all this volitility lately have any Hindenburg Omens appeared? Thanks, Peter.
arcon00224
Hi Peter, on your week ending Dec 17th (recorded Dec 18th) you showed the USO 48.4 offset downside projection at 43. I was just looking at your web app and if I'm seeing it correctly, that offset was invalidated today. Can you squeeze it in if you get a chance? Surprising if it was invalidated as it had an 89% accuracy rate
dr191103
That is going to be a GREAT update! Thanks Peter
thebigbluecheese
Peter, ....with the S&P 2/5 upside projection having been met, the 5 /501 weekly has not been invalidated (yet) & shows more upside to go....
Peter Eliades
Moderator
thebigbluecheese said:
Peter, ....with the S&P 2/5 upside projection having been met, the 5 /501 weekly has not been invalidated (yet) & shows more upside to go....
thebigbluecheese said:
Peter, ....with the S&P 2/5 upside projection having been met, the 5 /501 weekly has not been invalidated (yet) & shows more upside to go....
On my weekly chart of SPX, the 5/5.01 offset gave an upside projection starting at 4807.13. The high last week was 4818.62, satisfying the minimum upside projection. Do you show something different?
Peter Eliades
Moderator
arcon00224 said:
Hi Peter, on your week ending Dec 17th (recorded Dec 18th) you showed the USO 48.4 offset downside projection at 43. I was just looking at your web app and if I'm seeing it correctly, that offset was invalidated today. Can you squeeze it in if you get a chance? Surprising if it was invalidated as it had an 89% accuracy rate
Yes, Arcon, I agree with you. The downside has been invalidated and it was surprising because of the high statistical achievement rate...
thebigbluecheese
Peter Eliades said:
thebigbluecheese said:
Peter, ....with the S&P 2/5 upside projection having been met, the 5 /501 weekly has not been invalidated (yet) & shows more upside to go....
thebigbluecheese said:
Peter, ....with the S&P 2/5 upside projection having been met, the 5 /501 weekly has not been invalidated (yet) & shows more upside to go....
On my weekly chart of SPX, the 5/5.01 offset gave an upside projection starting at 4807.13. The high last week was 4818.62, satisfying the minimum upside projection. Do you show something different?
Yes, I see last weeks high as you say, but using the median, ie, per Hurst & not switching to using closing price, the chart shows the 5/5.1 target as 4837.549. Using close will show the 5/51 target has been met. I prefer consistency & not to flip between using median & close for reasons previously stated on this forum.
play_arrow
Comments (8)
You cannot post comments.
Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content!
Login for Members
Thanks, Peter. Appreciate the update.
How is the a/d line looking? With all this volitility lately have any Hindenburg Omens appeared? Thanks, Peter.
Hi Peter, on your week ending Dec 17th (recorded Dec 18th) you showed the USO 48.4 offset downside projection at 43. I was just looking at your web app and if I'm seeing it correctly, that offset was invalidated today. Can you squeeze it in if you get a chance? Surprising if it was invalidated as it had an 89% accuracy rate
That is going to be a GREAT update! Thanks Peter
Peter, ....with the S&P 2/5 upside projection having been met, the 5 /501 weekly has not been invalidated (yet) & shows more upside to go....
On my weekly chart of SPX, the 5/5.01 offset gave an upside projection starting at 4807.13. The high last week was 4818.62, satisfying the minimum upside projection. Do you show something different?
Yes, Arcon, I agree with you. The downside has been invalidated and it was surprising because of the high statistical achievement rate...
Yes, I see last weeks high as you say, but using the median, ie, per Hurst & not switching to using closing price, the chart shows the 5/5.1 target as 4837.549. Using close will show the 5/51 target has been met. I prefer consistency & not to flip between using median & close for reasons previously stated on this forum.
1-8 of 8