We welcome all comments related to market timing. We do not welcome political and insulting comments, however, and comments of a political nature belong elsewhere and could lead to removal and blocking the originator of such political comments.
You cannot post comments. Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content! Login for Members
Optimus
Thanks Peter. For this weekends update, can you please also share how you discover which sectors are being rotated into? Knowing the right sectors is huge for returns in my estimation. Thanks 🙏
Jeff
Peter, I hope I was not one of the people you just complained about as not being informed on how your cycle analysis works. I am an degreed engineer by profession of many decades. I am quite proficient at advanced mathematics. I clearly understand how you follow a summation of the "cycles" or "waves" and the theory behind your prediction system. I also realize you have 40+ years of experience analyzing the markets. So if you start talking about a negative divergence on an advance decline line, danger danger, and the market could be about to fall/decline, I listen very carefully.
However, I believe I can say with confidence that you have been for several weeks (maybe even months) since the market met your long term projection on a minimal basis, (which in itself is impressive) calling for a top of great significance. I can also say with confidence there isn't anyone doing quite what you are doing, and with the accuracy you are doing it.
However, as of late, and due to your long term cycle analysis being biased for a down in the long term by whatever long term cycle wave is peaking or has already peaked, the updates feel a bit like the movie groundhog day. Many of us subscribing to your service are looking for a long term buying opportunity or market low. And as you accurately described in past reports, this topping process can be frustrating and apparently drawn out.
Any new perspective on what to look for such as shorter loops, number of loops, how to use your system when trading, other fundamental data that is important that we should consider, the excellent overview of your theory tonight etc. does and would help everyone make the best use of your daily analysis during this potential topping process.
Thanks Jeff
Jon
Jeff said:
Peter, I hope I was not one of the people you just complained about as not being informed on how your cycle analysis works. I am an degreed engineer by profession of many decades. I am quite proficient at advanced mathematics. I clearly understand how you follow a summation of the "cycles" or "waves" and the theory behind your prediction system. I also realize you have 40+ years of experience analyzing the markets. So if you start talking about a negative divergence on an advance decline line, danger danger, and the market could be about to fall/decline, I listen very carefully.
However, I believe I can say with confidence that you have been for several weeks (maybe even months) since the market met your long term projection on a minimal basis, (which in itself is impressive) calling for a top of great significance. I can also say with confidence there isn't anyone doing quite what you are doing, and with the accuracy you are doing it.
However, as of late, and due to your long term cycle analysis being biased for a down in the long term by whatever long term cycle wave is peaking or has already peaked, the updates feel a bit like the movie groundhog day. Many of us subscribing to your service are looking for a long term buying opportunity or market low. And as you accurately described in past reports, this topping process can be frustrating and apparently drawn out.
Any new perspective on what to look for such as shorter loops, number of loops, how to use your system when trading, other fundamental data that is important that we should consider, the excellent overview of your theory tonight etc. does and would help everyone make the best use of your daily analysis during this potential topping process.
play_arrow
Comments (3)
You cannot post comments.
Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content!
Login for Members
Thanks Peter. For this weekends update, can you please also share how you discover which sectors are being rotated into? Knowing the right sectors is huge for returns in my estimation. Thanks 🙏
Peter, I hope I was not one of the people you just complained about as not being informed on how your cycle analysis works. I am an degreed engineer by profession of many decades. I am quite proficient at advanced mathematics. I clearly understand how you follow a summation of the "cycles" or "waves" and the theory behind your prediction system. I also realize you have 40+ years of experience analyzing the markets. So if you start talking about a negative divergence on an advance decline line, danger danger, and the market could be about to fall/decline, I listen very carefully.
However, I believe I can say with confidence that you have been for several weeks (maybe even months) since the market met your long term projection on a minimal basis, (which in itself is impressive) calling for a top of great significance. I can also say with confidence there isn't anyone doing quite what you are doing, and with the accuracy you are doing it.
However, as of late, and due to your long term cycle analysis being biased for a down in the long term by whatever long term cycle wave is peaking or has already peaked, the updates feel a bit like the movie groundhog day. Many of us subscribing to your service are looking for a long term buying opportunity or market low. And as you accurately described in past reports, this topping process can be frustrating and apparently drawn out.
Any new perspective on what to look for such as shorter loops, number of loops, how to use your system when trading, other fundamental data that is important that we should consider, the excellent overview of your theory tonight etc. does and would help everyone make the best use of your daily analysis during this potential topping process.
Thanks Jeff
Good post!
1-3 of 3