We welcome all comments related to market timing. We do not welcome political and insulting comments, however, and comments of a political nature belong elsewhere and could lead to removal and blocking the originator of such political comments.
You cannot post comments. Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content! Login for Members
nouseforaname
Peter Eliades’ trendline analysis, with its reliance on geometric patterns and time-based Fibonacci retracements, is more theoretical spectacle than practical strategy. It suffers from overfitting, lacks empirical validation, and consistently fails to deliver actionable signals in real-world markets. In the end, it’s a system built more on visual appeal than on statistical substance — elegant in hindsight, unreliable in practice. Simply said: Utter nosense for a future projection!
daniel039209
c.toenges5349 said:
Peter Eliades’ trendline analysis, with its reliance on geometric patterns and time-based Fibonacci retracements, is more theoretical spectacle than practical strategy. It suffers from overfitting, lacks empirical validation, and consistently fails to deliver actionable signals in real-world markets. In the end, it’s a system built more on visual appeal than on statistical substance — elegant in hindsight, unreliable in practice. Simply said: Utter nosense for a future projection!
That reads like an AI response!? True though, as there is NO actionable signals. Showed getting a cross down/sell within .50 cents of low,(very late, unactioinable) only to get a crossup buy 30 mins later....?
XXSPOWER127
c.toenges5349 said:
Peter Eliades’ trendline analysis, with its reliance on geometric patterns and time-based Fibonacci retracements, is more theoretical spectacle than practical strategy. It suffers from overfitting, lacks empirical validation, and consistently fails to deliver actionable signals in real-world markets. In the end, it’s a system built more on visual appeal than on statistical substance — elegant in hindsight, unreliable in practice. Simply said: Utter nosense for a future projection!
Chat GPT Anyone?
LMAO
daniel039209
"much too early to make a judgement with any confidence" about this being a top ? But, you have been doing JUST THAT for , hard to say how long. late 2022, late 2023 , most of 2024? most of 2025? NOW, you are NOT so confident? intellectual honesty, or a point of action, not potential 13,100 days apart points in time
play_arrow
Comments (4)
You cannot post comments.
Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content!
Login for Members
Peter Eliades’ trendline analysis, with its reliance on geometric patterns and time-based Fibonacci retracements, is more theoretical spectacle than practical strategy. It suffers from overfitting, lacks empirical validation, and consistently fails to deliver actionable signals in real-world markets. In the end, it’s a system built more on visual appeal than on statistical substance — elegant in hindsight, unreliable in practice. Simply said: Utter nosense for a future projection!
That reads like an AI response!? True though, as there is NO actionable signals. Showed getting a cross down/sell within .50 cents of low,(very late, unactioinable) only to get a crossup buy 30 mins later....?
Chat GPT Anyone?
LMAO
"much too early to make a judgement with any confidence" about this being a top ? But, you have been doing JUST THAT for , hard to say how long. late 2022, late 2023 , most of 2024? most of 2025? NOW, you are NOT so confident? intellectual honesty, or a point of action, not potential 13,100 days apart points in time
1-4 of 4