We welcome all comments related to market timing. We do not welcome political and insulting comments, however, and comments of a political nature belong elsewhere and could lead to removal and blocking the originator of such political comments.
You cannot post comments. Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content! Login for Members
odessamom2661
If possible keep updating on Nvda down projections updates are much needed along other 80% success rate stocks but nvda would do.
CS37
Since the NASDAQ made it's high around Christmas 2021, there seems to be a reasonably good correlation between BTCUSD and NASDAQ price action. Many BTC pundits have said that the recent rally in BTCUSD has at least something to do with the NASDAQ rally (also there's a joining with Ethereum, next month as well). Since you're warning that the stock market could have some major downside ahead (based on NVDA, AMD, TSLA, all of them being top 20 components of NASDAQ), I'm wondering if you can have a "big picture" look at BTCUSD projections, in your next update, to see if the recent BTCUSD correlation with NASDAQ would also support that viewpoint, as well?
odessamom2661
BTC nvda correlation idea supported here. Also was wondering on downside projections on BTC leading to fall of nvda and amd since they both are involved in mining ethereum
m1.c70
I see Berkshire Hathaway have been given the regulatory green light to buy up to 50% of OXY (Occidental Oil) Might be interesting to look at this large hydrocarbon stock to throw another perspective on oil/gas commodity space. Thanks for sharing your expert views on the market with your scientific model of stock markets.
odessamom2661
in other words if possible keep updates on new projections on NVDA and BTC and that should be sufficient.
eechentra2018
Software observation: I buy unrelated s/w where the license expires every 3 years forcing a repurchase of the updated version if desired. It's priced to make this approach palatable. Just an observation.
christine.d.iodice2593
Just a basic question on your projections. Does a 39 week offset projection suggest that the projection would be met within 39 weeks?? If not, is there a way to identify the TIME in which these projections might be met (if indeed they remained valid)??
m.hol228
Dear Peter, excellent work. Thank you.
What would you see as the changes we get one more final (blow off) top in the markets?
Since most important tops are made with a final blow off situation.
Thank u very much!
jefflane8592
Hi Peter…. Can you please talk a look at the silver etf SLV. I think according to the web app all downsides have been met. Since gold does not have high probability downside projection but also has an upside projection I am wondering if silver is giving us a clue that the gold downside projection will be invalidated…. Thanks
Peter Eliades
Moderator
christine.d.iodice2593 said:
Just a basic question on your projections. Does a 39 week offset projection suggest that the projection would be met within 39 weeks?? If not, is there a way to identify the TIME in which these projections might be met (if indeed they remained valid)??
In theory, Christine, an idealized 78 week cycle would go up for 39 weeks and down for 39 weeks. Upside and downside projections are given (again, in theory) half way up and half way down their 39 week advance or decline. SO, ideally, a nominal 78 week downside projection would be due by 19.5 weeks (4.5 months) from the time the projection is generated. This 39 week offset projection was generated in mid-July, so the idealized cycle would call for a bottom by the end of November. In my long experience with these projections, however, I should stipulate that price is far more important than time! Some projections are met much earlier than their due date, and some much later. The idealized pattern is simply a guideline...
play_arrow
Comments (10)
You cannot post comments.
Sign up for the Video or Bundle membership now and get access to exclusive content!
Login for Members
If possible keep updating on Nvda down projections updates are much needed along other 80% success rate stocks but nvda would do.
Since the NASDAQ made it's high around Christmas 2021, there seems to be a reasonably good correlation between BTCUSD and NASDAQ price action. Many BTC pundits have said that the recent rally in BTCUSD has at least something to do with the NASDAQ rally (also there's a joining with Ethereum, next month as well). Since you're warning that the stock market could have some major downside ahead (based on NVDA, AMD, TSLA, all of them being top 20 components of NASDAQ), I'm wondering if you can have a "big picture" look at BTCUSD projections, in your next update, to see if the recent BTCUSD correlation with NASDAQ would also support that viewpoint, as well?
BTC nvda correlation idea supported here. Also was wondering on downside projections on BTC leading to fall of nvda and amd since they both are involved in mining ethereum
I see Berkshire Hathaway have been given the regulatory green light to buy up to 50% of OXY (Occidental Oil) Might be interesting to look at this large hydrocarbon stock to throw another perspective on oil/gas commodity space. Thanks for sharing your expert views on the market with your scientific model of stock markets.
in other words if possible keep updates on new projections on NVDA and BTC and that should be sufficient.
Software observation: I buy unrelated s/w where the license expires every 3 years forcing a repurchase of the updated version if desired. It's priced to make this approach palatable. Just an observation.
Just a basic question on your projections. Does a 39 week offset projection suggest that the projection would be met within 39 weeks?? If not, is there a way to identify the TIME in which these projections might be met (if indeed they remained valid)??
Dear Peter, excellent work. Thank you. What would you see as the changes we get one more final (blow off) top in the markets? Since most important tops are made with a final blow off situation. Thank u very much!
Hi Peter…. Can you please talk a look at the silver etf SLV. I think according to the web app all downsides have been met. Since gold does not have high probability downside projection but also has an upside projection I am wondering if silver is giving us a clue that the gold downside projection will be invalidated…. Thanks
In theory, Christine, an idealized 78 week cycle would go up for 39 weeks and down for 39 weeks. Upside and downside projections are given (again, in theory) half way up and half way down their 39 week advance or decline. SO, ideally, a nominal 78 week downside projection would be due by 19.5 weeks (4.5 months) from the time the projection is generated. This 39 week offset projection was generated in mid-July, so the idealized cycle would call for a bottom by the end of November. In my long experience with these projections, however, I should stipulate that price is far more important than time! Some projections are met much earlier than their due date, and some much later. The idealized pattern is simply a guideline...
1-10 of 10